Next: Ionisation from charged particles
Up: The detection gas
Previous: The detection gas
The emission of X-rays from the radiator has to be matched to the
absorption method used for the detection. If the ionisation of a gas
is used for detection, the frequency response is rather limited with a
high Z gas like Xe as the optimal choice. The absorption length for
photons in the gas scales is approximately proportional to
in the range below 1 MeV where the photoelectric effect is dominant.
Hence it is impossible for a practical gaseous detector to detect
X-rays above 20 keV. The absorption length is defined as the length
where a factor 1 - e - 1 of the radiation is absorbed.
In fig. 3.7 is shown the absorption length for a pure
xenon gas, the gas mixture chosen for the ATLAS TRT, polypropylene and
Kapton. The absorption in a polypropylene radiator can be found by
scaling the values for solid polypropylene with the air/foil
proportion in the radiator.
Figure 3.7:
The absorption length for photons in xenon, the ATLAS TRT
gas, Kapton and a polypropylene (PP) at standard temperature and
pressure.
 |
For high photon energies (above 20 keV) the detection efficiency is
low as the photons pass straight through the detection gas; for low
photon energies (below a few keV) the efficiency is low as well as
most transition radiation photons are absorbed inside the radiator or
in the walls surrounding the detection gas. Those two constraints
define an optimal photon energy,
, for detection.
The foil thickness l1 in a N-foil radiator can be adjusted to make
the maximal output correspond to
. In
fig. 3.5 is shown that the maximum output is around
= 1/
. Using (3.18) and (3.21)
|
l1optimal = .
| (65)
|
Next: Ionisation from charged particles
Up: The detection gas
Previous: The detection gas
Ulrik Egede
1/8/1998