Next: Uncertainties in the underlying
Up: Global track reconstruction
Previous: The algorithm
The main problem of the algorithm are events where a wrong primary
vertex is selected with a large weight since this contributes to the
tails in the Higgs mass distribution. Events with zero selected
vertices at do not harm the mass resolution in comparison with using
the calorimeter or beam spot information only. A high value for the
cutoff on the quality (7.12) gives many events
with zero vertices found; a low value of the cutoff returns the Higgs
vertex in nearly every event but also many wrong vertex positions with
similar or higher weights. Both effects are shown in
fig. 7.8.
Figure 7.8:
The fraction of the total weight that enters into the
correct Higgs vertex as a function of the cutoff used for
selecting vertex candidates. In (b) the fraction of events with
no vertex selected as a function of the cutoff.
 |
At high luminosity and without using the calorimeter pointing the
optimal point for the Higgs signal significance, as defined in
(7.8), is for a high value of the quality cut where
a Higgs vertex candidate is found in 44% of the events and 30% of
the weight enters into the correct Higgs vertex (or 68% of the weight
in the events where at least one vertex is selected).
The optimisation of the cutoff is shown in fig. 7.9 for
two different situations. The solid lines shows the situation where
the calorimeter is used for the determination of the vertex position
in case zero vertices are selected; the dashed lines shows the
situation where just the average beam spot position is used. As
expected, the global tracking is much more important for the case
where the calorimeter pointing is not used. The significance of the
Higgs signal is given as the relative improvement compared to the
situation where no pointing information is used. The global tracking
method has its best performance where the relative significance
reaches its maximum.
Figure:
Effect of changing the cutoff used to select the
correct candidates for the
H

vertex. In (a) the Higgs mass
resolution is shown as a function of the weight in the correct
Higgs vertex and in (b) the mass resolution as a function of the
fraction of events with zero selected vertices from the global
tracking. In (c) and (d) the significance of the Higgs signal is
normalised to the situation where no pointing information is
used. The optimal cutoff to use is where the significance
reaches its maximum. In each figure is shown results where the
calorimeter pointing is used in the events with zero selected
vertices (solid lines) and where only the beam spot position is
used (dashed lines).
|
|
At low luminosity with much fewer background vertices a larger
efficiency for picking the correct vertex is of course possible.
Next: Uncertainties in the underlying
Up: Global track reconstruction
Previous: The algorithm
Ulrik Egede
1/8/1998